Duarte Levy..

Freelance journalist

Gonçalo Amaral’s condemnation was as atypical as the process

Amaral didn’t lost his credit

Faro ruling does not question Gonçalo Amaral's credibility in the Maddie case

PortuguêsEspañol – Français

The final ruling in the trial of the so-called “Leonor Cipriano case”, in which two of the five Polícia Judiciária (PJ) inspectors and former inspectors were condemned, ended up revealing itself as atypical as the process: the court of Faro considered that the practise of torture was proved but failed to indicate who the alleged aggressors were.
During all of the court sessions, no witnesses to the alleged torture acts were presented and the final ruling ended up being based on the reports from forensic experts, which were not founded on a physical exam of Leonor Cipriano, but rather on photographs that had been published years earlier by Expresso, and whose authenticity is still questioned.
Given the importance that was attributed to the photographs, it is strange that the court didn’t consider the doubts that persist concerning their origin. Doubts that could have been clarified if the defence had been permitted to hear the former journalist that was behind their publication, who is now the head of the Lawyers’ Order – through the cunning decision of entering the Order as an assistant in the process, Marinho Pinto kept the control over the proceedings in the Court of Faro, and at the same time escaped questioning.
Reading the final ruling, one can conclude that the court sustained its decision on the photographs, credible or not, as it couldn’t base itself on Leonor Cipriano who throughout the process gave several contradictory statements, thus confirming the analysis that had been made by Paulo Sargento, who described her as a compulsive liar.
Leonor changed her version about the manner in which she was aggressed, the dates and times, several times, but also the place where everything took place, and even her aggressors: one day she directly implied former coordinator Gonçalo Amaral, the next day she confessed that she hadn’t even seen him on the day of questioning.
Paulo Pereira Cristóvão, Leonel Marques and Paulo Marques Bom, who stood accused of torture, were found innocent, while António Cardoso and Gonçalo Amaral were condemned to suspended sentences: two years and three months and one year and six months in prison, respectively.

The “snowball” effect

António Cardoso’s report, which earned him his condemnation, and in which the inspector merely described in what manner Leonor Cipriano fell on the stairs, was not handed over to the scientific police’s lab, where an expert could have found a false signature, a changed date or even the replacement of excerpts of the text: presiding judge Henrique Pavão, in the name of the collective, upon considering that torture was proved, automatically removed the value of Cardoso’s report – if there was torture, then the report has to be false.
It is within this context that former PJ coordinator, Gonçalo Amaral, ends up being condemned: saying that torture existed, is to state that Cardoso lied when he wrote his service report, therefore – no matter whether he tells the truth or a lie – Amaral had to be condemned. Wasn’t that the initial goal?

– Like the French say, “c’était Q. F. D.”

Duarte Levy

◊ translated by Astro from Joana Morais blog.

Filed under: Joana Cipriano, Portugal, , , , , , ,

Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer abandoned complaint at European Court

Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia

Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia

Without any reply from Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia, and given his manifest lack of interest in answering the judges’ requests, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has archived a complaint that had been filed by Joana’s mother against the Portuguese State, in which she complained about the alleged lack of impartiality in the decision by the Court of Portimão that condemned her, at a first instance, to 24 years in prison over the homicide of her daughter.

Despite the fact that the ECHR accepted that complaint, Marcos Aragão Correia didn’t follow up on the process and didn’t send any argumentation or details concerning the complaint, within the regular deadlines.

The initial complaint had been sent to Strasburg by Leonor’s first lawyer, João Grade dos Santos, who in the meantime was removed from the case through a letter from Leonor, that was sent after she was convinced by Marcos Aragão Correia that he was the most appropriate lawyer to represent her in the process of the alleged aggressions that features Gonçalo Amaral as one of the arguidos.

This is not the first time that the lawyer from Madeira fails to react as one would expect from a professional, as his performance as Leonor’s lawyer in Faro was also branded by the presentation of several requests that equally failed the legal deadlines. According to the European Court’s archiving decision, the judges waited for Leonor’s arguments and fundaments until the end of October 2008.

Leonor Cipriano was initially condemned to 24 years in prison over her daughter Joana’s homicide, a sentence that was later reduced to 16 years and eight months, by an appeals court.

Both of Leonor’s lawyers, past and present, declined to comment on the case, but a source that is connected to the process at the court of Faro, contacted by 24Horas, didn’t show any surprise about the fact: “Since the beginning, we have been stressing that the gentleman is not here in order to represent Leonor’s interests, but rather to personally target some of the arguidos, namely Dr Gonçalo Amaral, and at the same time, to seek for a certain protagonism in the media”, the source said.

Duarte Levy also in 24horas

Filed under: Joana Cipriano, Portugal, , , , , ,

No Confidence
Personal Business Directory - BTS Local

Categories

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

RSS On the press

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Add to Technorati Favorites
MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected